Notes from a Singapore JC, and other matters of domestic life including marriage, pets and middle-class entertainment.
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Cutesy heroes
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
What a frog wants
Monday, November 02, 2009
Puppy love
Pardon me while I go fetch the mop. My tears are forming a little puddle on the laminate floor.
Sunday, November 01, 2009
A ball of string looks at another
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Careful, she bites!
Friday, October 30, 2009
The tadpole has blossomed
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Nerdy English teacher
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
We won? Wha...?
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Culture of excess
Monday, October 26, 2009
The goat
Sunday, October 25, 2009
X-species oral interfacing
Thursday, October 22, 2009
GP has a gender -- she's female
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Silenced
Sunday, October 18, 2009
KOREF, Day 2
Saturday, October 17, 2009
KOREF, Day 1
Friday, October 16, 2009
Premature graduation
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Not a level field
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Swift action
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
The last 100m
Monday, October 12, 2009
Clear and conspicuous
Loss leader
Service was brusque but that's the way I like it. I was there for a haircut, not chit-chat. I got what I asked for, and for what I paid that was more than satisfactory.
Chances are, they're using this pricing model as a loss leader. It'll entice clients who want more than just a haircut and from there they'll start the real commercial negotiations. But they're happy to take in cheapos like me too because at least I represent a bum on a seat in between the real customers. Win already!
Saturday, October 10, 2009
When 100% is not enough
Pain in a bottle
Friday, October 09, 2009
Paperless clinic
Thursday, October 08, 2009
Talking c*ck on TV
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Tuesday, October 06, 2009
MUA2 side mission tips (spoiler alert)
The more challenging missions are the solo ones, so I'll share the secrets of some of my successes here.
Jean Grey: use telekenesis (hold B) to slam those cranky bipedal bombs into the cars, thus clearing them easily and quickly so there's more time to devote to the battle with the Grey Gargoyle.
Gambit: use 52 Pickup liberally to break open boxes, junk and hidden rooms hiding those pesky hard-to-find data disks.
Thing: stun everybody with Hand Clap. 'nuff said.
Green Goblin: Spinning Blades is insanely lethal. Repeatedly 1-shot kill respawing Negative Zone guards until very close to quota, then after setting a bomb in the middle of the irritating electrified room, run for cover and stand at the exit doorway, continuing to kill guards until the exit door opens. As long as Gobby remains in the doorway, he can't be electrocuted.
Venom: Same mission as Gobby, except without the bomb setting task. Venom is easier because the mission allows a full team complement. Just keep killing respawning guards until quota.
Songbird: The most challenging thing is to keep the scientists she is escorting alive through the whole mission. Cast Sonic-Scream Shield and refresh often to keep her healthy and enemies weak. When she gets to a door, use Crushing Discord BEFORE opening it to kill enemies on the other side. She can hit them through the door, but they can't hit her. While Crushing Discord is good to use on Light mutants, Shrieking Slice works better on Heavies and Moonstone (Boss). Alternate the attacks when facing Moonstone 'cos Light mutants are attcking the scientists at the same time.
So, getting the whole team was do-able after all. Now the next challenge is to attain the Gold bonuses: same missions, higher quota of points to aim for.
Monday, October 05, 2009
Fishing for ideas
The kids are puzzled because they are not getting the rewards they think they are entitled to just because they've been able to re-tell several brain-cell killing pointless anecdotes they've forced themselves to study. They did study, didn't they? So why aren't they scoring like they expect? Simple, examples don't answer questions, no matter how long the list. I mean, examples are a fine and necessary thing, it's just that they alone are not the answer we're looking for.
If the question is "why?" the answer is "because." If the question is "should?" the answer is "why (or why not)." If the question is "how far" the answer is "under these specific conditions." If we think about answering the question, paying respect to its particular demands, then from a list of 12 questions, we have 12 options from which to choose our favourite.
By addressing the question, the relevant supporting evidence will surface without much effort. That is, as long as the kids have been keeping up with their daily readings. That's because the right context will locate the appropriate content. It's the difference between fishing in the ocean with random bait and fishing in a fish farm with a net. Ocean fishing is fun, but if we don't use the right bait we have no idea what we're going to catch, if anything at all. Fish farm fishing is hardly sporting, but we know what we're fishing for every time and we'll catch what we want.
GP is different. Unlike the other content subjects, we don't care what you KNOW. We care about what you THINK and if you have good reasons for thinking that way. Which is why our kids are still all lost at sea.
Sunday, October 04, 2009
MUA2 comes up short
Saturday, October 03, 2009
Talented and bemused
Friday, October 02, 2009
Domestic violence
Thursday, October 01, 2009
98 years old
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Lunchtime toast
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Undo the damage
But exam grades are just one little thing. Rubrics and tolerances balance each other out and collectively, grades simply point which direction the wind is generally blowing. What matters more is the level of engagement our kids have with texts that are not primarily written in the local vernacular and responding to them at the same level.
It's not a matter of which version is 'superior' or 'inferior' but rather whether one's command of language either facilitates or impedes understanding between people trying to communicate with one another. If there is no or little understanding, then there is a failure to communicate. In school terms, either the text is not getting through to the candidate, or the candidate isn't getting through to the marker, or both. Whichever, that is what the 'FAIL' grade pragmatically represents.
But that's just the grade. On the grander scale, too many people stuck in Singlish mode, unable to code-switch to the standard English of academic and intellectual discourse means too many Singaporeans being unable to participate in and contribute to complex and abstract thought.
If this is true, then our Colonial Masters haven't really left. We've just made it easier for them to give us our orders because we're proud to have 'upgraded' ourselves to speak a little more like them. But with this level of language ability, we are still unable to view them on equal terms.
Outside my window
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Cognitive catatonia
Monday, September 21, 2009
A major change of policy
Sunday, September 20, 2009
I no can has faceburger?
Saturday, September 19, 2009
We be travellin'
Friday, September 18, 2009
Sheepish
Thursday, September 17, 2009
BFC ventures afield
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
MUA2: first impressions
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
The sky's the limit -- even for student projects
What usually holds us back from great projects that work is that we constrain them tightly within the parameters of the exam question, and there we have the edges of the box, clearly defined for us -- the lines we are not supposed to colour outside of. The question then has to be, "how big is your box?" Well, as far as the students involved in the story (above) were concerned, the box was as big as the stratosphere.
Projects don't have to be microscopic for the sake of 'manageability' and 'feasibility'. The beauty of the subject of Project Work is that if the size of the project overflows the box, the project can still take on a life of its own. The important thing is that it's meaningful, it's real, and it's done. And by the time the examination comes around, we'll find that the box is in fact infinitely enlargeable.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Historical interlude
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Mmm, more mussels
We'll get our dates right next time, 'k?
Anyway, after detoxing we went straight back to devouring this lovely pot of Belgian mussels (moules au vin blanc). We've had our eye on Oosters at Suntec City for a while already, and since we were in the neighbourhood, we couldn't pass up the opportunity.
All we needed between ourselves was this 1kg pot of mussels, cooked soft and tender, simmering in this clear vegetable soup that was knockout delish. But that's not all, this order also comes with a side of fries and two dipping sauces: creamy mayo and honey-mustard. That would actually have sufficed, but we got greedy and shared an onion soup as well. A bit salty, that one, but a liberal sprinkling of parmesan put things right... for me, at least.
Although this place prides itself with its range of imported beers, it served ice-cold water to us two cheapos at no charge. Nice.
Rag(dolls) against the Machine
Friday, September 11, 2009
On the 5th day, he rested
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Knees, quads, glutes
Wednesday, September 09, 2009
Segway adventure
Tuesday, September 08, 2009
Bedok Park Connector finally found!
Monday, September 07, 2009
Lane workout
Three game average: 153, not too bad considering I haven't bowled in months.
Sunday, September 06, 2009
Up early for Tiong Bahru tsui kueh
Parking was already crappy by the time we got there (though I got lucky with a lot just at the market entrance). Whole place has been upgraded. It's now a two-storey complex with the wet market on the ground floor and cooked food upstairs.
Was worried that the food would have been likewise 'upgraded', but the tsui kueh is still good, the shell maintaining its silky smooth texture, and the chye poh (pickled radish) filling a delicate balance of salt and sweet. Not too oily.
Oh, this stall is the one with the less flashy signage. We picked it 'cos it looked more genuine. Think we made the right choice.
Saturday, September 05, 2009
Feel the burn
Friday, September 04, 2009
Exhibitionist
Anyway, iLine needed a partner with wheels and a little muscle for the heavy lifting, and since Amy wasn't available, nor X, Y or Z, I was the next logical choice. So both iLine and I set up our booth at Cedar's career festival thingy to publicize our college as an option for the girls' next port-of-call on their way up the Education pyramid.
Our collaterals were the three standees we used as the backdrop, and our giveaways: our standard flyers, our custom bottles of distilled water, and our little bags of AAA-grade rice. It was the rice that was unusual enough to be the first item to disappear from our display. They made great conversation pieces 'cos the girls wanted to know wassup with the rice?
Truth be told, I'm not actually part of the crew that gets sent to these events, so I don't actually know the standard pitch that go with these materials. However, this was an opportunity to invent wild associations about how rice is a staple, it's nutritious, it's down-to-earth, and its triple-A grade is meant to symbolize the triple-A experience they will receive in our care, should they become our students next year. Oh, and it also reminds us of home and family, which as a college, is one of our more identifying and endearing features... if you like that kind of thing.
There were other more mundane questions as well, practical things like our cut-off, curricula and co-curricula programmes, success rates. The usual.
Not sure we made that great an impact in the end. We were only one out of many competing exhibitors, after all. I guess I'll only know when I see some familiar faces in my tutorials next year.
Thursday, September 03, 2009
The lull
Wednesday, September 02, 2009
Night Safari, almost
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
Rah rah for Sports Resort
Monday, August 31, 2009
Teachers' Day 09
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Laughing till it hurt
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Wrap. Print. Party!
Friday, August 28, 2009
Teachers' Day dinner interruptions
To be honest, we weren't all that prepared for the task even though we'd agreed to it months ago. The scripting mostly comprised a flurry of hasty email back-and-forths based on a rough guideline of the programme and coordinating MC patter in English and Mandarin. We were still scripting lines right up to our sequence run -- I wouldn't call it a rehearsal 'cos we were only running lines and not working out movement, traffic patterns, transitions and technical coordination.
Adding to the nerve-wracking situation were the many dynamic changes in programe, including a formal toast by the VIPs that was not previously scheduled. And although the programme was going faster than expected we were instructed to hurry up even faster. We ended up saying goodbye to everybody before dessert! I think that was win-win for all of us. Heh.
But this is the job of the MC. It's not theatre where there's time to figure things out and plan for contingencies (and even then things still do screw up). For us MCs, we ran lines for the formal bits of programme -- it's the formal bits that are the most scary 'cos it's unseemly to mess up people's names and titles --and here, reading off cuecards became an absolute necessity for me. My runs without cuecards were disastrous.
But rehearsals apart, most of our air-time was ad lib, going with the flow and trying our best to converse coherently between Fen and myself in two separate languages. Oddly enough, I felt more relaxed with the ad libs than the formal bits. It was fun to run the games and introduce the performances 'cos then I could focus on what was necessary rather than fret over not getting it wrong.
Fen and I had a great table to retreat to in between stage appearances. Thanks for keeping food for us, encouraging us with chatter, playing our games, impromptu rehearsing the formal toast with me, and doing some behind-the-scenes running that was necessary to keep the programme flowing smoothly. My on-stage tribute to you guys was sincere, if inadvertently cut short by an over-enthu Fen.
MC'ing for a combined three schools needed more prep time. There were many niggling mechanical problems, gaffed lines, moments of awkward tongue-tiedness, nervous voices cracking, for a functional but unpolished product. Nevertheless, we had excellent tech support in Events Architects who improv'ed effortlessly with us yet were very understated and nearly invisible the whole time. Their presence covered up a lot of sins.
Overall, I think we did ok. Not great, but a serviceable job despite our nerves and inexperience. It helped a lot that the audience was as generous as it was.
And now, I'm going to take a whole weekend off. Zzzzz...
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Criminals, all of you!
Whoever designed the survey for Ipos may have arranged it such that our local intellectual property watchdog got only the feedback it wanted to hear. TNP summarises:
"IN THE real world, almost all of the 100 Singaporeans polled by The New Paper believe that stealing goodies from a store is wrong.But they feel it's okay to illegally download copyrighted material from the Internet. In another survey of 1,011 Singaporeans done by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (Ipos), released this April, about 44 per cent of Singaporeans think that illegal downloads of copyrighted material is not considered theft."
The more people appear to have unlightened views about respecting intellectual property, the more justification Ipos has for continuing its crusade. And the more reason it has to consider punitive measures, like the new 'three strikes' law, against these all these unrepentant criminal scumbags.
But take a look at the two survey questions given to the respondents:
1) Is it wrong to illegally download music, movies and shows?
40% of total said NO which shows how hardcore recalcitrant they are to willfully commit an illegal act.
If it's illegal, then of course it's wrong, hence 60% said YES. But the answer might have been more interesting if the question had been, "Is it wrong to download music, movies and shows?" Chances are, remove the word "illegal" and 100% will say NO. And since they aren't admitting to committing an illegal act, 100% of them won't think they are criminals.
2) Is it wrong to buy pirated CDs, VCDs and DVDs?
Only 26% of total said NO, which means most people DO think buying such stuff is wrong.
Of course buying pirated CDs, VCDs, and DVDs is wrong. Why waste money on pirated goods when you can download the same thing for free (see Q1)? Duh!
Ipos needs better, less confused, less ambiguous data if it really wants to act in the best interests of society. As it is, they see criminals everywhere, though the people don't quite see themselves as such. Getting all litigious isn't the solution. Enforcement doesn't make a law right, not if the people aren't convinced it is in the first place.